Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 11703 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 21:06:06 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 21:06:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7197 invoked by uid 97); 4 Apr 2003 21:08:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 7190 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 21:08:01 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 21:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 11450 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2003 21:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11439 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 21:06:04 -0000 Received: from f114.law15.hotmail.com (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.23.114) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 21:06:04 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:06:09 -0800 Received: from 32.97.110.142 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:06:09 GMT X-Originating-IP: [32.97.110.142] X-Originating-Email: [dgraham1980@hotmail.com] From: "David Graham" To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Bcc: Subject: RE: [digester] RegexRules Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 14:06:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2003 21:06:09.0688 (UTC) FILETIME=[040C7180:01C2FAEE] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >I think [1.4] also has a concept of a provider, so Log4j may become a JDK >Log >provider with extra power provided through the config file or something. >I'm guessing a lot here based on memory of conversations. That's incorrect. The lack of a provider interface was one of the main issues that angered Log4J people. > >I think I'd disagree that Logging is not speed-sensitive. It's usually one >of the biggest deals, that logging when turned off does not hurt speed. >I'm probably reading your statement wrong. > Yes it is speed sensitive but not in the same way or to the same degree as a regex engine. David _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org