Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89566 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 20:16:33 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 20:16:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5953 invoked by uid 97); 4 Apr 2003 20:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 5946 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 20:18:28 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 20:18:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 89343 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2003 20:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 89326 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 20:16:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO appserv1.transolutions.net) (216.146.80.164) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 20:16:31 -0000 Received: from tobrien ([12.209.211.25]) by appserv1.transolutions.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 35-65231U200L100S0V35) with ESMTP id net for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:16:34 -0600 From: tobrien@transolutions.net (O'brien, Tim) To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Subject: RE: [digester] RegexRules Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:16:23 -0600 Message-ID: <002501c2fae7$11597560$19d3d10c@tobrien> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I hate to propose such a thing, but is there a need for a commons-regex which would perform the same functions as commons-logging? Where we'd have JDK 1.4 Regular Expressions, Jakarta-RegEx and Jakarta-ORO. -------- Tim O'Brien > -----Original Message----- > From: robert burrell donkin > [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:17 PM > To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: [digester] RegexRules > > > after bit of thought about some recent comments from user, > i've committed > some code based around the idea of using regex's in a pattern > matching > Rules implementation. in order to give flexibility, i've made > the actual > regex matching implementation pluggable. > > i was thinking about creating regex matching implementations based on > jakarta-ORO and jakarta-regex but i don't want to make > Digester dependent > on these subprojects. some other places at jakarta use contribs or a > separate releasable jar for these optional classes. anyone have any > preferences - or any better ideas? > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org