commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject Re: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64
Date Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:36:32 GMT
i started a commons etiquette page on the wiki a little while ago which 
contains some opinions on the promotion process:

http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaCommonsEtiquette

it might of some help a little further down the line.

- robert

On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 07:07 PM, O'brien, Tim wrote:

> Base64, Hex, Soundex, and Metaphone are stable and ready for consumption.
> The legacy Base64 implementation has been preserved in order to preserve
> backwards compatibility for projects which currently depend upon codec 1.
> 0.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/codec/index.html
>
>
>
> --------
> Tim O'Brien
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:rhoegg@isisnetworks.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:55 AM
>> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: commons codec and Base64
>>
>>
>> Let's say it's "stabilizing".  The code there is also slated
>> for 2.0 of
>> Apache XML-RPC.  We have been the most recent project to work on that
>> code, but are coordinating with the HttpClient team on
>> agreeing on the
>> API.  The API is probably not stable as of now, but I'd love
>> to see your
>> ideas on it.
>>
>> The code has been examined quite closely for RFC compliance and
>> performance, so I would suggest using the Codec Base64 implementation
>> for that reason anyway.
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Hoegg
>> ISIS Networks
>> http://www.isisnetworks.net
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> What is the status of Sandbox-Commons-Codec?
>>>
>>> I see in the current HTTPClient (2.0 Alpha) Javadoc that
>> Codec will be
>>> used in HTTPC 2.1. Is Codec stable? I am looking for a Base64
>>> implementation and an API change in a deeply buried Xerces
>> base64 impl
>>> is making me look for a implementation which is more
>> 'public' or in a
>>> 'higher' level package/component.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message