commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <ggreg...@seagullsw.com>
Subject RE: [Pool] What's left for a release?
Date Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:46:55 GMT
Hello,

Could you address why doing (2) only be an issue? 

It certainly would be fast task, I am volunteering of course!

Thanks,
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 8:44 AM
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Pool] What's left for a release?

-1 on changing this for 2.0.  Struts needs this release soon.

David


>Hello,
>
>Could we address http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19192 
>for
>2.0?
>
>This is not a simple issue but it is very important for our application. I
>see two issues raised in GenericObjectPool by 19192:
>
>(1) What is the "correct" or desired default behavior? If we need a release
>very soon (to satisfy a Struts dependency for example), this would argue 
>for
>not changing the locking behavior without some serious unit tests added in
>this department. So, if time is of the essence, don't touch it, and we can
>discuss it post-2.0.
>
>(2) If we consider that a goal for the class GenericObjectPool is that it 
>be
>customizable on top of "configurable" (Javadoc comment), by which I mean
>extendable/subclassable, then we should change the protection of fields and
>methods from private to protected to allow for this to happen. This is not
>the first time that we have seen the suggestion that a feature/bug could
>have been addressed by subclassing but that in fact could not due to
>field/method protection. (I am leaving aside the fact that one can change
>any code in [pool] and recompile).
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Gary
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Mitchell [mailto:jmitchell@apache.org]
>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 4:16 AM
>To: jakarta-commons-dev@apache.org
>Subject: [Pool] What's left for a release?
>
>Initial search in bugzilla for pool turned up 3 bugs (ok, 2 bugs and 1
>Enhancement).  The 2 bugs that were there have patches available.
>
>I was wondering if there were any specific reasons (other than
>time/resources)
>that those patches had not been committed.
>
>We are pushing for a RC2 over in the Struts camp and we depend on a new
>release of Pool.  I'd like to help with this if I can.
>
>Your thoughts?
>
>
>--
>James Mitchell
>Software Developer/Struts Evangelist
>http://www.open-tools.org
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message