commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17327] - Add BlockingQueue queue implementation
Date Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:01:16 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17327>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17327

Add BlockingQueue queue implementation





------- Additional Comments From scolebourne@joda.org  2003-04-26 16:01 -------
[Collections] has Buffer and PriorityQueue interfaces that feel like they ought 
to have some role here. Basically, I don't want to add a BlockingQueue class 
that stands alone (doesn't implement Collection or any other interface).

I think the best answer may be to define a new interface to replace 
PriorityQueue (call it Queue!). Q should extend Collection (and Buffer? or is 
Buffer already == Q?). Implementations can then start.

On the exceptions viewpoint, I too am now fed up of checked exceptions. So, I 
reckon that the interface should probably wrap interrupted exceptions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message