Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9102 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 19:10:12 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 19:10:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 838 invoked by uid 97); 6 Mar 2003 19:11:53 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 831 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 19:11:53 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 19:11:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 8855 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2003 19:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8844 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 19:10:08 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 19:10:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 823 invoked by uid 50); 6 Mar 2003 19:11:50 -0000 Date: 6 Mar 2003 19:11:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20030306191150.822.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15123] - Incorrect stack trace shown when abandoned connections are closed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15123 Incorrect stack trace shown when abandoned connections are closed ------- Additional Comments From rwaldhoff@apache.org 2003-03-06 19:11 ------- I don't follow this well enough to be confident I'm fixing it. For example, I don't see any other calls to setStackTrace. Perhaps someone more comfortable with the AbandonedObject stuff could take a look, or submit a test case that demonstates this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org