commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert McIntosh <>
Subject Re: [jelly] Scope revisited
Date Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:43:57 GMT
I don't have a use case for events either, but I thought I would throw 
it out there for discussion. I agree that the Scope interface be very 
simple and the context should have a default scope, which can be 
overridden by the user.


bob mcwhirter wrote:

>>2. Have/keep the scope listeners and events?
>I personally see Scope as a way to keep me from having to keep writing
>subclasses of JellyContext when I want the context to be backed by my
>own data structure.
>Talking with Strachan I think we're pondering 
>    context.setDefaultScope( myScope );
>In that vein, making Scope very simple be best for my particular
>public interface Scope
>    void setVariable(String name, Object value);
>    Object getVariable(String name);
>If the JellyContext wants to check for ListenableScope and fire events,
>that's cool, but it'd also be overblown for all of my use-cases.
>	-bob
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message