commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14983] - GenericObjectPool should allow for manual population of the pool
Date Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:42:46 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983

GenericObjectPool should allow for manual population of the pool





------- Additional Comments From rwaldhoff@apache.org  2003-03-14 15:42 -------
And I meant to add to that last post:

This is one of the nice things about the current method signature: "void 
addObject();".  It still forces the client to obtain the added object via the 
borrowObject interface.  addObject(Object) is a little more dangerous in that 
way, since it is possible for the client to use the added object without 
obtaining it from the pool.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message