commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodney Waldhoff <>
Subject Re: [POOL] When to call passivateObject() vs destroyObject()
Date Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:50:00 GMT
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Quinton McCombs wrote:

> From reading the docs on PoolableObjectFactory, it appears that if an
> object is going to be destroyed, there is no reason to call
> passivateObject() first.  Is this correct?

Correct.  The idea is that passivateObject(x) prepares 'x' to be stored
within the pool.  If your intention is to destroy an object, there is no
need to passivate it first.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message