commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14983] - GenericObjectPool should allow for manual population of the pool
Date Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:52:48 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983

GenericObjectPool should allow for manual population of the pool





------- Additional Comments From lbreisacher@seagullsw.com  2003-03-10 19:52 -------
Uh, I'm a bit confused about this request. The original posting by 
sschwell@yahoo.com is quite reasonable and small (manual population of a pool 
via an addNewObject() method), but then Jeff Varszegi's posting is a long list 
of possible improvements to commons-pool.

I have a need for an addNewObject() method, and I've even written one and will 
attach it here as a PATCH.  Can we perhaps split Jeff's posting out into a 
separate bug report (or perhaps several individual reports), so that these 
separate things do not get so mushed together, and so that the addObject PATCH 
proposed here gets serious consideration? Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message