commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Szlapa" <>
Subject Re: [PATCH][Beanutils] LocaleConvertUtils
Date Tue, 04 Mar 2003 01:22:07 GMT
Hi Robert,

I am very sorry for my late reply, I did try to monitor the list closely but
got a little overwhelmed by number of messages and missed your reply (next
time sill put the filter).

I have created new deffect report #17624 and attached patch
to it. I am not attaching the recreated patch to the email since I am not
sure what happened to the attachement (seems to be in place in my Sent copy
of the email).

I did not split the patch into several patches since all changes revolve
around same set of few files and are related to implementing test case that
is similar to BeanUtils..

Hope you find it useful, let me know if you have any comments, I could
implement them if necessary.

Michael Szlapa

----- Original Message -----
From: "robert burrell donkin" <>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Beanutils] LocaleConvertUtils

> On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 02:26 AM, Michael Szlapa wrote:
> > Hi,
> hi Michael
> i didn't want to look at this before the 1.6.1 release since it was bug
> fixes only.
> > Just started using LocaleConvertUtils and I must say it is great to have
> > the
> > converter utils that allow fine tuning of conversion patterns. However I
> > have found that although individual converters usually work,
> > LocaleConvertUtils has probably never worked (there is an error during
> > initialization of static member). Given then fact that the rest of bean
> > utils is very high quality, IMHO it should not have not been included
> > in
> > the official release version of the Beanutils (1.5/1.6).
> i had to think about including it - but i don't regret committing it. a
> number of users have remarked how useful they found it :)
> with a bit of help, hopefully now we'll be able to push it forward. your
> original post was missing the patch. could you repost?
> if you haven't contributed to jakarta before, you might want to read:
> and
> since your patches are on different issues, what would be great is if you
> could separate them so that i can commit a patch for each issue
> individually. (don't worry if that's too much effort.)
> - robert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message