commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Caswell" <>
Subject RE: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to DbUtils.ResultSetHandler
Date Sun, 09 Mar 2003 23:51:36 GMT
But that would be up to the class implementing ResultSetHandler. Having the
operation in the interface would simply allow a caller to get an instance of
some ResultSetMetaData, however the implementing class handler choses to
provide it. In the test I wrote, I had the implementing class grab the RSMD
instance from the RS as the first thing done in the handle method, and the
instance of RSMD returned by the RS was intact after the RS was closed.

Steven Caswell
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
"One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juozas Baliuka [] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 5:25 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List;
> Subject: Re: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to 
> DbUtils.ResultSetHandler
> I am not sure it will work on closed resultsetm, It is better 
> to return custom metadata object and value as result from 
> handler. I have changed "handle" signature it will have 
> "params" from prepared statement.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Caswell" <>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <>
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:07 PM
> Subject: [dbutils] propose adding getResultSetMetaData to 
> DbUtils.ResultSetHandler
> As the subject says, I'd like to modify 
> DbUtils.ResultSetHandler to add a getResultSetMetaData 
> operation. This would provide a callback to allow an 
> application using DbUtils.execute to get the column 
> descriptions from the handler. Proposed signature:
> public ResultSetMetaData getResultSetMetaData();
> Steven Caswell
> "In our own native land, in defense of the freedom that is 
> our birthright, and which we ever enjoyed till the late 
> violation of it -- for the protection of our property, 
> acquired solely by the honest industry of our fore-fathers 
> and ourselves, against violence actually offered, we have 
> taken up arms. We shall lay them down when hostilities shall 
> cease on the part of the aggressors, and all danger of their 
> being renewed shall be removed, and not before." - Thomas Jefferson

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message