commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Graph2] nsUML license problem
Date Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:32:22 GMT
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Steve Downey <steve.downey@globeinvestment.com>
wrote:

> Would it be possible to take an approach analagous to Ant's optional
> tasks?

I'm pretty sure there is no optional task that depends on an LGPLed
library.

> That is, distribute the code that _uses_ the API, but not distribute
> the library itself?

See this mail

<http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=community@apache.org&msgNo=1419>

where Roy clearly states that one import statement is too much.

> Based on what Ken posted, it looks like linking against a LGPL
> library is OK, while distributing it is not.

Please read Ken's mail again.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message