commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@generationjava.com>
Subject Re: [EL] instanceof
Date Fri, 07 Feb 2003 04:20:08 GMT
I meant to reply to this on Taglibs earlier.

I imagine EL will not be able to implement it until it is in the JSP 2.0
specification as, as far as I know, commons-el is the EL component of the
JSP 2.0 spec.

But I could be utterly wrong :)

Hen

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote:

> In JSTL Spec 1.0, section A.4, the keyword "instanceof" seems to be reserved
> for future use.  Would the commons-el group consider implementing instanceof
> as a BinaryOperator.  I was fooling around with my working copy, and it
> looks as if it is as easy as adding a new error message, a new operator
> class and making a small modification to ELParser.jj.
>
> Is this something [el] would be interested in pursuing.
>
> --------
> Tim O'Brien
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: robert burrell donkin
> > [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:39 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [EL] Promotion to jakarta-commons?
> >
> >
> > hi Jan
> >
> > it's not the information - but the procedure that's concerning. i'm
> > worried that later someone might say 'EL shouldn't be in the
> > commons since
> > there wasn't a proper VOTE with  a proper procedure' - and
> > they'd be right.
> >   things like this have a history of blowing up sooner or later.
> >
> > i don't think that there's any chance of EL being rejected
> > but i'd really
> > like to have a proper [VOTE] thread with a proper proposal for the
> > archives. if i have to, i will propose this VOTE myself but
> > it'd be better
> > coming from yourself.
> >
> > - robert
> >
> > On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:16 PM, Jan Luehe wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Rod,
> > >
> > >> I'm +1 on moving [EL] to commons proper, but -1 on promoting
> > >> components this casually.  If this is meant to be a
> > binding vote on
> > >> promoting EL, it ought to be on a [VOTE] thread, and include a
> > >> proposal that "identif[ies] the rationale for the package,
> > its scope,
> > >> its interaction with other packages and products, the Commons
> > >> resources, if any, to be created, the initial source from
> > which the
> > >> package is to be created, the coding conventions used for
> > the package
> > >> (if different from the Sun coding conventions), and the
> > initial set
> > >> of committers." (#17 at
> > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html).
> > >
> > > actually, I think all the information you requested is already
> > > provided in jakarta-commons-sandbox/el/PROPOSAL.html, which I
> > > circulated to this list when originally proposing this project.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you need any additional information.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message