commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeffrey Dever <jsde...@sympatico.ca>
Subject Re: [codec] RE: Base64.java
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:11:16 GMT
Well said.  Totally agree.

Ryan Hoegg wrote:

> We do as well.  Codec should probably end up with the union, not the 
> intersection   However, ours tests for the MIME specific 76 character 
> line wrapping.
>
> --
> Ryan Hoegg
> ISIS Networks
> http://www.isisnetworks.net
>
> Jeffrey Dever wrote:
>
>> That sounds good here too.  We only call Base64 methods a couple of 
>> times anyway, so adaptation is a minor issue.
>>
>> Just a note about tests, we have a Junit test class (not sure if 
>> xml-rpc has one) that should go along with the main Base64 class.  
>> You did a grep on the code base so I'm sure you are aware of it.
>>
>> Jandalf.
>>
>>> I like your plan Tim.  Let's get 1.1 nailed down so we are all on 
>>> the same codebase, and do the design of 2.0 right.  I don't think 
>>> XML-RPC cares much whether we get the default in decode(byte[]) in 
>>> 1.1, I think that decision should be made based on RFC interpretation.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Ryan Hoegg
>>> ISIS Networks
>>> http://www.isisnetworks.net 
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message