commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Hoegg <>
Subject Re: [codec] RE:
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:00:17 GMT
We do as well.  Codec should probably end up with the union, not the 
intersection   However, ours tests for the MIME specific 76 character 
line wrapping.

Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks

Jeffrey Dever wrote:

> That sounds good here too.  We only call Base64 methods a couple of 
> times anyway, so adaptation is a minor issue.
> Just a note about tests, we have a Junit test class (not sure if 
> xml-rpc has one) that should go along with the main Base64 class.  You 
> did a grep on the code base so I'm sure you are aware of it.
> Jandalf.
>> I like your plan Tim.  Let's get 1.1 nailed down so we are all on the 
>> same codebase, and do the design of 2.0 right.  I don't think XML-RPC 
>> cares much whether we get the default in decode(byte[]) in 1.1, I 
>> think that decision should be made based on RFC interpretation.
>> -- 
>> Ryan Hoegg
>> ISIS Networks

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message