commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Hoegg <rho...@isisnetworks.net>
Subject Re: [codec] RE: Base64.java
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:00:17 GMT
We do as well.  Codec should probably end up with the union, not the 
intersection   However, ours tests for the MIME specific 76 character 
line wrapping.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net

Jeffrey Dever wrote:

> That sounds good here too.  We only call Base64 methods a couple of 
> times anyway, so adaptation is a minor issue.
>
> Just a note about tests, we have a Junit test class (not sure if 
> xml-rpc has one) that should go along with the main Base64 class.  You 
> did a grep on the code base so I'm sure you are aware of it.
>
> Jandalf.
>
>> I like your plan Tim.  Let's get 1.1 nailed down so we are all on the 
>> same codebase, and do the design of 2.0 right.  I don't think XML-RPC 
>> cares much whether we get the default in decode(byte[]) in 1.1, I 
>> think that decision should be made based on RFC interpretation.
>>
>> -- 
>> Ryan Hoegg
>> ISIS Networks
>> http://www.isisnetworks.net 
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message