commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <>
Subject Re: [jelly][betwixt]
Date Sat, 18 Jan 2003 05:52:23 GMT

From: "Morgan Delagrange" <>
> I think the Betwixt tags might be better as a separate
> build, although that build could be under the Jelly or
> Betwixt tree.
> Here's the rule of thumb IMO.  If an application
> cannot be executed without Jelly (e.g. Maven, Latka),
> then the application should host the tags in its main
> build.  Contrarily if the Jelly tags is simply an
> alternative syntax for a library (e.g. Betwixt,
> HttpClient), then those tags should have a separate
> build rather than pulling all the Jelly dependencies
> into the main build.  All IMO.

Good rule.

Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message