Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 52973 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 02:34:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 02:34:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 17047 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 02:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17024 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 02:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17000 invoked by uid 98); 7 Dec 2002 02:35:42 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:34:21 -0800 (PST) From: "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper In-Reply-To: <011201c29d31$b690daa0$9865fea9@spiritsoft.com> Message-ID: <20021206091502.I83469-100000@icarus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote: > ----- Cut Here ----- > I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: > [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help I will add this to the set of commons packages I build nightly, and to the "commons-combo" package (that builds a combined JAR/Javadocs for all the released jakarta-commons libraries). Although, I'm beginning to wonder if subproject/project status might be better. Jelly core looks like it's becoming a framework with lots of optional packages (and their associated dependencies) on top of it, very reminiscent of Ant ... In the mean time, a real release from Commons is appropriate. > [ ] +0 - I support this move, but cannot assist > [ ] -0 - I don't support this move > [ ] -1 - I vote against this move (requires valid *technical* > reasoning) > ----- Cut Here ----- > > James Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: