Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 10652 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 16:32:40 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 16:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 17952 invoked by uid 97); 22 Dec 2002 16:33:51 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17933 invoked by uid 97); 22 Dec 2002 16:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17921 invoked by uid 98); 22 Dec 2002 16:33:50 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <002001c2a9d8$38d66540$148d27d9@oemcomputer> From: "Stephen Colebourne" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" References: <3E01BAE6.4060100@schof.com> Subject: Re: [lang] FastDateFormat questions Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:35:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: "Sean Schofield" > Here's where I am at with FastDateFormat. I changed the package name > (to org.apache.commons.lang.time.) I also pulled down the source code > for Pair that it required. I noticed that Pair seemed like the > DefaultMapEntry in commons-collections (am I wrong?) Is commons-lang > allowed to have dependencies with commons-collections or should we try > to avaoid that? (My guess is you will say avoid.) This dependency should be avoided, so yes an inner class is appropriate. > Finally, I wrote a few unit tests for FastDateFormat. Once we resolve > the Pair issue I'd like to submit FastDateFormat and FastDateFormatTests > to be added to CVS. Do we need all of the unit tests to be complete > before adding? There are a lot to write and I know Eric, and others are > also volunteering to help here. I would prefer unit tests to be there before adding to the CVS, but if it helps make the work visible then sometimes it can be committed without. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: