commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] moving Jelly to the commons proper
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:52:17 GMT
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote:
> > ----- Cut Here -----
> > I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper:
> > [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help
> I will add this to the set of commons packages I build nightly, and to the
> "commons-combo" package (that builds a combined JAR/Javadocs for all the
> released jakarta-commons libraries).
> Although, I'm beginning to wonder if subproject/project status might be
> better.  Jelly core looks like it's becoming a framework with lots of
> optional packages (and their associated dependencies) on top of it, very
> reminiscent of Ant ...


I think we need a small Jelly core, with few dependencies and then seperate
optional packages. We can always make a "jelly-combo" JAR like
"commons-combo" with all the different packages combined into a single jar
for those that want it.


Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message