commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <>
Subject Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements
Date Sat, 16 Nov 2002 18:10:54 GMT

I'm all for having consistent javadoc. Feel like writing up the 'rules'
for the javadoc style you've ended up on? [From the files often changed I
suspect I'm the biggest offender and I'd like to stop offending :)]

Or is it just that I'm not doing the sun how to write javadoc properly? I
did discover a years-long misunderstanding I've been labouring under a
while back :)


On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Fredrik Westermarck wrote:

> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Patch applied. (We haven't actually agreed on a format for <p> </p>
> > tags in javadoc, but I decided that there was other useful formatting in the
> > patch as well - actually since this is committed, now a decision on the
> > style is probably effectively taken for lang ;-).
> When browsing the generated Javadoc I realized that the formatting was
> diffrent depending who had written the class or method. Therefore I felt
> that it's better to have one consistent formatting, that later on can be
> changed if it is needed.
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message