Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 73945 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 17:58:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 17:58:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 27278 invoked by uid 97); 15 Oct 2002 17:59:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26936 invoked by uid 97); 15 Oct 2002 17:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26477 invoked by uid 98); 15 Oct 2002 17:58:52 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: [Logging] How can I submit a concrete Log implementation (WLSLogger)? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:55:00 -0700 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021015193659.02117bc8@mail.qos.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.84.39.162 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034704610 28486 64.84.39.162 (15 Oct 2002 17:56:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:56:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ceki G�lc� wrote: > At 10:31 15.10.2002 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote: >>Maybe we can do it at a later stage or in a LogFactory2 - so >>the code would work even if discovery is not available/used. >>I think the current hardcoded discovery, even if duplicated and >>not as complete as commons-discovery - does work reasonably well. >> >>-- >>Costin > > I happen to think that the commons-logging discovery method is too > smart for its own good but I am biased. :-) As long as it accepts that the user is smarter ( and accept explicit config overrides ) I think it's nice to be smart. -- Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: