Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 82212 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2002 22:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2002 22:53:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23416 invoked by uid 97); 19 Oct 2002 22:54:36 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23394 invoked by uid 97); 19 Oct 2002 22:54:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23378 invoked by uid 98); 19 Oct 2002 22:54:35 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:54:01 +0100 Subject: Re: [general] checkstyle report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v546) From: John Keyes To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <008b01c277c1$92209ec0$3f6527d9@oemcomputer> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.546) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I know about how to fix these but what I was asking was was a more general topic. As a good deal of the commons projects inherit the POM from the CVS root I was wondering if it would be a good idea to have a the checkstyle properties set at this level also so all of the 'mavenized' projects pick up the same settings. I think this mail is perhaps a bit more coherent ;) -John K On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 23:47 Europe/Dublin, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > On lang, changing the line length to 120 helped a lot. Also, I don't > know if > maven is on checkstyle 2.4, but if so it has a setting to deal with > RuntimeException throws clauses in javadoc correctly which should be > set > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Keyes" > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:29 PM > Subject: Re: [general] checkstyle report > > >> Yeap I'm on about the maven checkstyle report. >> -John K >> >> On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 23:24 Europe/Dublin, Stephen Colebourne >> wrote: >> >>> Are you talking about the maven checkstyle report? Or a specific >>> projects? >>> Stephen >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "John Keyes" >>>> I would be interested to hear people's opinions on the resolution >>>> of checkstyle's error reporting. There are two options, one is to >>>> correct the code style so it conforms to the checkstyle settings, >>>> the other is to modify the settings to be less stringent. >>>> >>>> IMO, it would be great to have a common style across commons. >>>> I do think there would be opposition if this became a requirement >>>> though so I think relaxing the checkstyle properties is probably >>>> the way to go. >>>> >>>> What do others think? >>>> >>>> -John K >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: