Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 32263 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 17:01:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 17:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14421 invoked by uid 97); 23 Oct 2002 16:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14317 invoked by uid 97); 23 Oct 2002 16:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14202 invoked by uid 98); 23 Oct 2002 16:59:22 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Proposal: httpd-like PMC organisation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:58:02 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6D5313AC@mail.nextance.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Proposal: httpd-like PMC organisation Thread-Index: AcJ6M6GTegde+BxuQpGC31ZUq/JVOQAgZn3A From: "Scott Sanders" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am +1 on this Costin, could you just patch the charter and then we vote on it? I would prefer to change the wording to use anything besides PMC though. IMO. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:cmanolache@yahoo.com]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:45 PM > To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Proposal: httpd-like PMC organisation >=20 >=20 > We already have a line in our charter about having a jakarta-commons=20 > specific PMC. Right now it is modeled after jakarta, with 3=20 > members. >=20 > I would like to propose changing this number to include more=20 > people - I think the right solution is more closer to what=20 > httpd and apr projects are doing, where the PMC is composed=20 > of most active commiters. >=20 > My proposal is to modify the charter so that a=20 > jakarta-commons PMC is composed of all active commiters. This=20 > will be volunteer-based, in the sense that any active=20 > commiter who wants to become part of the PMC will announce=20 > his willingness to participate. >=20 > Questions: > - should we vote on the volunteering offer ? What is httpd doing ? > - Should we impose a 2-3 month wait period for new commiters ? ) > - should the pmc have a separate mail list ? ( I personally=20 > don't think so - but that's how other pmcs are organised ) >=20 > The commons PMC members will split the task of monitoring the=20 > files. All decisions will continue to be taken by majority=20 > vote of all jakarta-commons commiters. >=20 > Not that this is not a proposal to form a top-level project -=20 > just to better organise ourself. Jakarta-commons is IMO at=20 > the core of jakarta - with the most diverse set of commiters=20 > from almost all jakarta projects. Any major issue will be=20 > forwarded to the Jakarta PMC.=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Costin >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For=20 > additional commands,=20 > e-mail: >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: