Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90003 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 01:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 01:25:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 25660 invoked by uid 97); 23 Oct 2002 01:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25633 invoked by uid 97); 23 Oct 2002 01:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25619 invoked by uid 98); 23 Oct 2002 01:25:57 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: monitoring the sandbox [WAS Re: License and copyright issues] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:24:55 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6D531364@mail.nextance.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: monitoring the sandbox [WAS Re: License and copyright issues] Thread-Index: AcJ5/w8q8L0S3pHKRpSU924xUHymdAAElxow From: "Scott Sanders" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve,=20 > the only=20 > > way > > to pick up the slack is for EVERYONE to be watching out for=20 > this type of=20 > > thing. >=20 > +1 >=20 > i think that we in the commons needs to take the supervision of the=20 > sandbox more seriously. since it's part of our subproject, we=20 > need to take=20 > responsibility for the contents of the sandbox and ensure that this=20 > facility is used correctly. >=20 > (if we could get the volunteers) one way we could make this=20 > happen would=20 > be to assign watchers for each sandbox component (i think that costin=20 > either proposed this or gave me the idea). if each person had=20 > only a few=20 > components, then it should be possible to monitor the source and the=20 > commit emails and bring to notice of the community anything=20 > that looked=20 > dubious, >=20 > comments? volunteers? >=20 I am volunteering, and I would hope that everyone does. Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: