Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9257 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 8976 invoked by uid 97); 24 Oct 2002 03:51:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8960 invoked by uid 97); 24 Oct 2002 03:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8918 invoked by uid 98); 24 Oct 2002 03:51:56 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <20021024035102.16321.qmail@web12406.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:51:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Morgan Delagrange Reply-To: morgand@apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal: httpd-like PMC organisation To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Costin Manolache wrote: > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > > > Quite right, your proposal did say "all > committers". > > Sounds like we're essentially arguing about > nothing. > > I'm saying that all committers should keep an eye > on > > commits. You're saying that the PMC should > monitor > > all commits, but that the PMC should be all the > > committers. Fine. > > > > I'm not sure what is gained by waving a wand over > the > > committers and naming them an unofficial PMC, but > I > > agree that we need to be responsible for commits. > > You're right - we're arguing about nothing. It's > just a > naming/terminology issue - to make things more in > line > with what other expect things to be called. > > But I think there's something more - if we can use > it to > better organise and keep track of who's active, on > what and what other components is he interested in. > Right now we kind of use STATUS, but it doesn't > reflect who's active or who's monitoring what. > > I think we should wait for things to at jakarta > level > to settle down, and then reopen the issue. > > -- > Costin > Works for me. - Morgan ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: