commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - commons-latka
Date Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:36:11 GMT
Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote on 19/10/2002 12:00:59 AM:

> On 18 Oct 2002, Ted Husted <ted@husted.com> wrote:
> 
> >     cannot resolve symbol : class Jelly
> 
> Houston we have a problem, Jelly is currently not Gumpified (because
> it depends on a lot of stuff that is not Gumpified either and even
> seemed to run into circular dependencies).
> 
> Is there a stable binary of Jelly that Latka could depend upon?  Note

If it's a URL, how about 
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-jelly/jars/commons-jelly-SNAPSHOT.jar 
as that always
holds the last published version of jelly?

> that Latka would lose the "there is an incompatible API change"
> warning mechanism of Gump if we allowed it to have binary
> dependencies.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message