commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Turner <tur...@blackbear.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call)
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2002 18:30:48 GMT
That's certainly a reasonable request, getting the doc and examples in 
shape is a major requirement in my book for doing a 1.0 release.

James

At 03:04 PM 10/1/2002, Taras Tielkes wrote:
>I'm willing to help and contribute to this project in the future.
>(Especially where it concerns using this component outside of Struts)
>
>However, with the current documentation (ahem?), it's hard for me to
>even figure out *how* things are supposed to work, let alone see if
>they are working correctly.
>
>What I would really like to see is a sample (no unit test please,
>that's not what is needed) that demonstrates most of the functionality
>of commons-validator. I'm talking about a small, command-line
>application that does some non-trivial validation. Multiple dependant
>validations, using localized resources, some custom validations that
>return errors in a meaningful way, using commons-validator utility
>methods/classes where applicable.
>
>I think the presence of such a sample would help people understand how
>commons-validator can be used. This would again result in more
>community participation for this component. (At least, this applies to
>myself)
>
>And yes, this is a bit off-topic for this thread :-)
>
>Kind regards,
>
>tt
>
> > might i suggestion that the validator component considers asking
>martin
> > and scott to be committers?
> >
> > they've both volunteered to help with the release and are commons
> > committers of good repute but (at the moment) their votes are
>non-binding.
> >   this means that you're still 2 votes short of the quorum you need.
> >
> > - robert
> >
> > On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:16 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think it would be great if we could get a DTD into the first
>release, as
> > > Taras Tielkes suggested. It'd be nice to see his other comments
>addressed
> > > also, but I wouldn't hold up the first release for them.
> > >
> > > I can help with the release process if needed.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: James Turner [mailto:turner@blackbear.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM
> > >> To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > >> Subject: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> And yea, my first call unto the masses for a vote on a Validator
>1.0
> > >> release was met with a deafening silence.  So second try:
> > >> please vote!
> > >>
> > >> +1:  Finally having a release of Validator sounds good
> > >> -1:  I have a good reason why now would not be a good time to
> > >> do a release
> > >>
> > >> James
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.> > org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.> > org>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message