commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <c...@qos.ch>
Subject Re: [logging] Log4j's NDC and MDC
Date Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:39:13 GMT
At 11:10 10.10.2002 -0400, Steve Downey wrote:
>It looks like the concept is available in both LogKit and Log4J, although in
>slightly differenct forms. I don't know if the forms are compatible.
>
>It's not available in JDK 1.4 logging.
>
>So, the question is two-fold. Can the differences between LogKit and Log4J be
>harmonized, and is this useful if it might be a no-op?

Yes on both accounts. Yes they should be compatible, and yes a no-op under 
JDK 1.4 is better than having nothing under log4j or logkit.


>On Wednesday 09 October 2002 09:02 pm, Sean C. Sullivan wrote:
> > I spotted this message on the jboss-developer mailing list.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason@pl...]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:24 PM
> > > To: jboss-development@li...
> > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Design: Plans to decouple JBoss from log4j
> > >
> > >
> > > It is too bad commons logging does not provide abstractions
> > > for a ContextStack or ContextMap similar to Log4j's NDC and
> > > MDC.  These are valuable constructs.
> > >
> > > Do you know anyone on the commons logging team?
> > >
> > > --jason

--
Ceki

TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message