commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: [beanutils] ready for 1.5 release?
Date Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:51:42 GMT
12728 is now marked RESOLVED.  Can everyone give it a try and report
back?  The current tests passed just fine.

Are we ready for the release?

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Sanders 
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [beanutils] ready for 1.5 release?
> 
> 
> I would say patch 12728 and release.
> 
> The sealed attribute might be nice though :)
> 
> Scott
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:rob@AlmostHuman.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:03 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [beanutils] ready for 1.5 release?
> > 
> > 
> > On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 07:39 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > We should deal with Bugzilla 12728 (patch supplied) and 
> think about
> > > some of the enhancement requests, but other than that I'm game.
> > 
> > here are my random thoughts on the enhancements currently 
> in bugzilla:
> > 
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7135
> > 
> > Misleading error message when beaninfo class conflict occurs
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > i'd like to see this improved but it'd mean changes to
> > MethodUtils. i'd 
> > prefer to leave any changes to MethodUtil until after this 
> > release since 
> > lang is now released and it may be moving there.
> > 
> > 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 	
> Nested Bean Collection
> ----------------------
> structs-related. (i'll bow to others greater wisdom on this.)
> 
> 
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9226

Add methods to find and invoke constructor methods
--------------------------------------------------
doesn't really fit in beanutils. i plan to add this as a lang
enhancement.


http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10167

Mapped properties require getter
--------------------------------
not a killer feature but probably worth doing. i'd be happy to release 
without it.


http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 	
Need getPropertyType(Class theClass, String propName)
-----------------------------------------------------
(not sure i have a very good understanding of this one.) seems
reasonable 
but again not exactly a killer feature. again, happy to release without
it.

- robert




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message