commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Berin Loritsch <>
Subject Re: [clazz] Type-based or instance-based metadata?
Date Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:46:52 GMT
Adam Murdoch wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stephen Colebourne []
>>Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 9:19 AM
>>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>>Subject: Re: [clazz] Type-based or instance-based metadata?
>>>These attributes can be read from the IClass (BTW, I hate prefixed
>>>interfaces should be your primary type, so if we have any 
>>idioms put it on
>>>implementing class).
>>The name of the interface could be AClass, with the implementation as
>>AClassImpl. Not sure if this is better though. IClass and AClass 
>>feels more
>>'right' (ie. normally I would agree with your no prefix comment Berin)
> How about ClassInfo? ClassMeta? MetaClass? ClassMetaInfo?

I like MetaClass and MetaMethod.

I.e. for all Meta enabled reflection (i.e. attributes) we use the Meta
prefix.  It makes sense in this sense because we are not following the
trap of encoding type into the name (avoiding hungarian notation


"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message