commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [clazz] Some code to consider
Date Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:32:25 GMT
This adds to the complexity of the API. What advantages do we get in return?
(Certainly naming would be easier ;-)

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Juozas Baliuka" <baliuka@centras.lt>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [clazz] Some code to consider


> Hi,
> I want to add all "features" to Meta* interfaces, I think this model must
> not to "reduce" jdk reflection.
> I propose two packages :
> 1)  "xreflect" package  (we can use naming like java.lang.reflect.* +
> "attributes").
> 2)  "xbeans" package for "beans" like framework. ("delegate" can live
here)
>
> "tools" like "xdoclets" is subject for next component, but we need some
API
> in [clazz] to plug implementations.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message