Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 5862 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 21:10:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 21:10:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 9049 invoked by uid 97); 27 Sep 2002 21:11:33 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9014 invoked by uid 97); 27 Sep 2002 21:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8948 invoked by uid 98); 27 Sep 2002 21:11:31 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:11:13 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) From: robert burrell donkin To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <7382FCA44E27D411BD4A00508BD68F95053CD34F@pigeon.tumbleweed.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N might i suggestion that the validator component considers asking martin and scott to be committers? they've both volunteered to help with the release and are commons committers of good repute but (at the moment) their votes are non-binding. this means that you're still 2 votes short of the quorum you need. - robert On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:16 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > +1 > > I think it would be great if we could get a DTD into the first release, as > Taras Tielkes suggested. It'd be nice to see his other comments addressed > also, but I wouldn't hold up the first release for them. > > I can help with the release process if needed. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Turner [mailto:turner@blackbear.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM >> To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Validator 1.0 Release (Second Call) >> >> >> And yea, my first call unto the masses for a vote on a Validator 1.0 >> release was met with a deafening silence. So second try: >> please vote! >> >> +1: Finally having a release of Validator sounds good >> -1: I have a good reason why now would not be a good time to >> do a release >> >> James >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: org> > For additional commands, e-mail: org> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: