Return-Path: 
 <commons-dev-return-16144-qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 40654 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 21:17:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 21:17:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 3776 invoked by uid 97); 18 Sep 2002 21:17:41 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3752 invoked by uid 97); 18 Sep 2002 21:17:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3740 invoked by uid 98); 18 Sep 2002 21:17:40 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Steve Downey <steve.downey@netfolio.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Release Was: [lang] Builders complete?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:14:46 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209180808220.27361-100000@umbongo.flamefew.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209180808220.27361-100000@umbongo.flamefew.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200209181714.46344.steve.downey@netfolio.com>
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:21 am, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> > No one had volunteered yet.
>
> I'm happy to. Had been giving everyone time to play with builders as th=
ey
> weren't something I had a great itch for.
>
> There are a lot of things we have on the post-release list, and Stephen=
's
> got a good thing going in the STATUS.html to show post release ideas. I
> suggest we all continue to add issues and ideas to that to signify thin=
gs
> we itch/care about, such as your introspection Steven.
It's Steve who's got the introspection itch. Steven will have to scratch =
his=20
own itches. <g>

>
> Daniel's volunteered to handle the actual CVS whatnot. Tagging and
> branching and whittling into shape, so it seems our process is:
>
> 1) Decide on what we want to go and what doesn't go.
What's there now + Steven's planned fixes for exceptions?

> 2) All agree that we're happy with the state of what is going, includin=
g
>    javadoc and unit tests.

There's work to be done on the javadocs. Nothing crippling, but it could =
be=20
better. The unit tests seem to be pretty good, though.

> 3) Make a preliminery build available internally. I'd like to then run
>    JDiff on this with the beta. This hopefully can make us aware of any
>    issues. This means having tag stuff in cvs done at this point.
> 4) Propose a vote for a 1.0 release.
> 5) Worry about the website. I doubt we'll be doing a lot in the way of
>    tutorials or docs etc, but we need to make sure the simple bits we h=
ave
>    there are good.
> 6) Ensure we are in Bugzilla. I'm not sure if we are yet.
> 7) Release.
>
> Does this sound right to everyone?
>
> Hen

Sounds good to me.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>