commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13098] - Digester Performance
Date Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:46:14 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098

Digester Performance





------- Additional Comments From rdonkin@apache.org  2002-09-28 07:46 -------
the advantage of caching in the reflection layer is that the cache can very easily be shared

between all rule instances. 

if the cache is written correctlty, it will cache at every stage - it will cache methods[]
calls as 
well as mapping method to parameter for use in invocation. getting methods[] is very 
slow and caching both will improve typical usage much more than caching in a single rule.

the right place to implement these caching mechanisms is in the reflection layer rather 
than in digester.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message