Return-Path: 
 <commons-dev-return-13832-qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 83323 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 20:37:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 20:37:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 21520 invoked by uid 97); 13 Aug 2002 20:37:42 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21504 invoked by uid 97); 13 Aug 2002 20:37:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21492 invoked by uid 98); 13 Aug 2002 20:37:41 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002)
X-Authentication-Warning: costinm.sfo.covalent.net: costin owned process doing
 -bs
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: costinm@covalent.net
X-X-Sender: costin@costinm.sfo.covalent.net
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [daemon] Moving to commons proper
In-Reply-To: <3D596B5E.1000301@apache.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208131328010.1576-100000@costinm.sfo.covalent.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The daemon component is reaching a point where it starts to be mature 
> and provide useful services. It is also in use in the upcoming Tomcat 5 
> project.
> 
> I propose that daemon is moved to commons proper, and steps are taken to 
> eventually release a 1.0 version based on that code.
> 
> <ballot>
> +1 [ ] Yes, move daemon to commons
> -1 [X] No, because:

Deamon is yet-another lifecycle interface. I don't think this is right for
[pattern], nor [discovery] - and same arguments apply to daemon. 

I'll change my vote to +1 if the interface is droped and introspection
is used.  

Costin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>