Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 91050 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2002 19:46:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2002 19:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5207 invoked by uid 97); 31 Aug 2002 19:46:56 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5189 invoked by uid 97); 31 Aug 2002 19:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5177 invoked by uid 98); 31 Aug 2002 19:46:55 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Server-Uuid: 6E802067-ECFC-4FC2-A617-DD5220DD9CBB Message-ID: <7382FCA44E27D411BD4A00508BD68F9504BB0C0C@pigeon.tumbleweed.com> From: "Martin Cooper" To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Subject: RE: [lang] 1.0 release foci (fwd) Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:45:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 116FC241138349-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:scolebourne@btopenworld.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 4:25 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] 1.0 release foci (fwd) > > > From: "Henri Yandell" > > I've put the Maven site up at: > > > > http://www.generationjava.com/maven/jakarta-commons/lang/index.html > > > > if it's of use to anyone. Reading the javadoc through that > is often more > > fun/easier. > > I've addressed some of the checkstyle points. However, some checkstyle > issues don't seem like problems: > 1) Line length - even the CVS $Id$ lines are longer than 80 chars. I'd > propose a 120 char limit Personally, I prefer to stick to the 80 character limit, knowing that I'll get 2 violations from Checkstyle on each file - one on line 2 and one usually on or around line 70 - due to CVS keyword expansions which are out of my control. The main reason is that this makes it much easier to work on two files side by side - either in my editor or, more importantly, in tkdiff - without having to scroll horizontally all the time. -- Martin Cooper > 2) Throwing runtime exceptions - I guess this is a bug/feature of > checkstyle. As far as I know, a runtime exception shouldn't > be declared in > the throws clause but should be in the javadoc > > Stephen > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: