Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 64793 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 23:08:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 23:08:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 18698 invoked by uid 97); 23 Aug 2002 23:08:44 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18665 invoked by uid 97); 23 Aug 2002 23:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18653 invoked by uid 98); 23 Aug 2002 23:08:42 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Server-Uuid: 6E802067-ECFC-4FC2-A617-DD5220DD9CBB Message-ID: <7382FCA44E27D411BD4A00508BD68F9504BB0B9B@pigeon.tumbleweed.com> From: "Martin Cooper" To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Subject: RE: [lang] 1.0 release foci (fwd) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:07:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 11781E9721642-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:25 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] 1.0 release foci (fwd) > > > > > > So, separating these out we have functionality of: > > 1.0 > > > 2) Enum. This is in the main cvs now. > > > 3) HashCodeUtils. This is now HashCodeBuilder. > > > 4) ExceptionUtils. This is in CVS now. > > 2.0/1.x > > > 1) Reflection: Could we put this off for 2.0? I'd like to see this in 1.x (assuming we have such a release), and I'm prepared to help with this particular item. -- Martin Cooper > > > 5) StringUtils. There are some suggested additions to this to be > > > discussed, but not a lot. > > > 6) NumberUtils. Some suggestion of extra functions for > it, but nothing > > > really concrete yet. 2.0? > > > 7) Util.CalendarUtils/*. Anything pressing in here or 2.0? > > > 8) SystemUtils. Seems cool :) > > > 9) CharSetUtils. Should this be there? > 10) A million ideas in our heads. I suggest that these are either > commited to the Lang sandbox or to Utils [depending on just how nicely > they look in Lang]. Thigns like, new methods for NumberUtils or > StringUtils could also feasibly be placed in a temporary class in the > sandbox. > > > Then, once the functionalities for 1.0 are stable, we have the usual > suspects to round up. Unit testing for the 1.0's, javadoc, webpage > grumblings, release.txt creating, release-manager accepting, release > voting, release doing. > > I might be missing something there or have something in the > wrong order. > I'm not sure when the proper time is to decide who will manage the > release. > > Hen > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: