commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@collab.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:06:40 GMT
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@adeptra.com> writes:

...
> Of course, some of you might think that would probably be best - think of
> the CPU cycle savings of having no public methods - no one would have the
> opportunity to abuse the methods in string utils by calling them.

HEHEHEH

...
> It's yet another example of how you can't really predict who might
> come along and use your code - therefore leaving as many open
> options as possible is the best strategy in situations like this.

Yup.  So long as an API doesn't present the possibility of causing
>internal errors in your library at runtime.  Which in this ctor case,
it clearly doesn't.
-- 

Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message