commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael A. Smith" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:26:45 GMT
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> You have seen nothing but an attempt to compromise. Suggestions of static
> instances, of extensions, of deprecation, of final are all attempts at
> compromise. It's been a heated debate yes, and one which has failed to
> reach a compromise, but large parts were learning about Velocity abilities
> and ideas which died due to being too high maintainance.

Speaking of compromises, was there any objection to the bean wrapper
class idea other than maintenance?  If I can eliminate the maintenance
from this idea (by volunteering for now, and later to build a tool to
automate the process), are there any other objections to the idea?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message