commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: [digester][beanutils][logging] release plan...?
Date Thu, 08 Aug 2002 22:59:44 GMT
It's very important to me that commons-logging have commons-discovery 
integrated in the near term.  I'm +1 with a commons-logging 1.0.1 release 
now, if I can plan on a 1.0.2 very soon after commons-discovery reaches a 

and I welcome anyone who can step me through, or point me to a doc for, 
the process for Jakarta releases (RC1 for discovery) !!!   As soon as that 
is done, I'd like to start integrating into logging.. so a 1.0.1 BEFORE 
that makes even more sense.


Richard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:

> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:15:39 +0100
> From: robert burrell donkin <>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List 
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <>
> Subject: [digester][beanutils][logging] release plan...?
> i really think that these components are overdue release. we need 
> bug fixed versions of beanutils and digester before we can think about
> refactoring beanutils and optimizing digester.
> there is one outstanding bug (rather than enhancements) each for 
> and digester. i'm personally happy for a release to go forward with 
> still outstanding for the reasons below:
> i'm not sure i understand what the problem is here. is this really a 

I just dealt with this one.  It's possible that this really is a bug, but
I proposed a workaround that doesn't compromise backwards compatibility.

> i have a feeling that this has already been resolve by previous bug 
>   unfortunately, the bug reporter emailed me to say that they are too 
> to provide the information i asked them for. i'm happy to mark this as


> commons-logging has a number of outstanding bugs but it'll only be a 
> release.

Some of these bugfixes (already in the nightly builds) are pretty
important.  I'd like to see 1.0.1 of this as well.

> what else needs to be done before we're in a position to vote on these
> releases?

I think we're done.

> - robert


> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message