commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@adeptra.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (3b) XxxUtilsConstructors last chance
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:01:39 GMT
On 8/21/02 7:38 PM, "Steven Caswell" <steven@caswell.name> wrote:

> My vote is -0 instead of +0 because I haven't heard anyone present a
> serious reason as to why a utility class, a non-bean, should be subject
> to subclassing. 

I can only assume you're joking.  Maybe someone wants to change the
behavior?


> I can somewhat see the need for construction for tools
> that require a bean (which a utility class really isn't), but I think
> other compromises, such as a wrapper class, would also be reasonable.

Do you want to maintain that wrapper class?


-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr. 
Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
geirm@adeptra.com
+1-203-247-1713



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message