commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:23:16 GMT

Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "Jack, Paul" <pjack@sfaf.org>
> 
>>Actually, now that I've purged, here's another idea. :)
>>
>>1.  Constructors are public.  Yay, Velocity can use the
>>utility classes.
>>
>>2.  The utility classes are marked as final.  Yay, no one
>>can add instance methods or otherwise wreak havoc with the
>>API.
>>
>>3.  People can waste memory with unneeded instances.  Boo,
>>but not a major show-stopper.
> 
> 
> Personally I really like this idea. No misuse of the deprecated word, no
> subclass issues, and who cares about the memory.

It really looks like it's actually *brilliant* :-)

Of course, usually when ideas are so brilliant they bite back in 
unespected ways ;-) (let's hope not)

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message