commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael A. Smith" <>
Subject Re: [Collections] subpackage for iterators?
Date Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:27:23 GMT
Jack, Paul wrote:
> There's like four new iterators that have been added since 2.0.
> I'm wondering if it makes since to have an iterators subpackage.
> Problem is, the six or seven previous iterators would still be
> in the top-level package.  We'd either have to deprecate them
> (ugly) or leave them there (confusing).  Still, since new iterators
> seem to commonly pop up, it might make sense to factor them into
> their own package.
> Thoughts?

I'm pretty ambivalent.  You're right about things though.  Moving them 
to a separate package is either ugly or confusing.  But at least the 
ugly is potentially a short-term ugly.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message