commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [daemon] Moving to commons proper
Date Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:13:25 GMT
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <>
>>I think that apart from the discussion going on about interfaces, the
>>fact that Daemon would use introspection instead of an interface would
>>be a *feature*, not a hack to keep Costin or me happy.
> In what way? I feel that I must be really dense.
> If Daemon has one or more methods that are going to be called, why can they
> not be declared in an interface?

Wrong question.

I mean that id Daemon can launch an existing class without having to 
implement any interface, I would see this as a welcome feature.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message