commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Juozas Baliuka" <bali...@centras.lt>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:47:30 GMT

Yes, Invoker wrapper is good solution too.

> "Juozas Baliuka" <baliuka@mwm.lt> writes:
>
> > Current version (1.0-b1) of Lang StringUtils has private constructor.
>
> Changed without consensus.  I've already spent more time on this
> discussion than I should have, and am about to throw a -1 VETO on the
> private ctor change.
>
> > I propose to change it to "public depricated" in commons-lang-1.0 and
> > "private final" in commons-lang-2.0 and up.
>
> -1, absolutely no way.
>
> > It will help for "tools like Velocity" to support "static utilty
classes" ,
> > tools will have time
> > to implement support for something like this or "better" :
>
> You've got to be joking.  I already proposed a better solution with
> the Invoker wrapper and introspector adjustment anyhow.
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message