commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Juozas Baliuka" <bali...@centras.lt>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:53:56 GMT

Hi,
I do not believe somebody will prove "final" or "extendable" is "better".
I think we need to release things "as it was" at this time and to pay more
attention
before to promote something to commons proper.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Rall" <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors


> "Jack, Paul" <pjack@sfaf.org> writes:
>
> > > > "final" doe's not reduces usability of static methods
> > >
> > > It does in that you can no longer extend the class to tack on your own
> > > utility methods, presenting a single class interface with low
> > > overhead.
> >
> > Your syntactic sugar is not worth my maintainence headache.
>
> Syntactic sugar?  A cute but hardly relevant comment, Paul.
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message