commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] (re-vote) XxxUtils constructors
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:19:03 GMT
From: "Michael A. Smith" <mas@apache.org>
> ok, so now there's zero maintenance on this compromise.  Are there any 
> other reasons why this doesn't make people happy?

This is the sixth compromise we've offered. So I'm not optimistic. 

But I now recognise it as the correct design option:
- a static utility classes should be private
- an adaptor bean is required for bean based tools with the same methods
- no big maintainance problem

Stephen



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message