commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Juozas Baliuka" <bali...@centras.lt>
Subject Re: Commons Core (was RE: [pattern][lang] Cross dependecy)
Date Sat, 10 Aug 2002 06:47:11 GMT

Yes, it must be better to integrate.
 It is not a big problem with jars, but integrated documentation can be very
useful.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <craigmcc@apache.org>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: <bloritsch@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Commons Core (was RE: [pattern][lang] Cross dependecy)


>
>
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Juozas Baliuka wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 21:25:12 +0200
> > From: Juozas Baliuka <baliuka@centras.lt>
> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
<commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>,
> >      bloritsch@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Commons Core (was RE: [pattern][lang] Cross dependecy)
> >
> > Yes, it is impossible to find "good" packages for "core",
> > but I think we can find some better name for "small" packages in single
> > "medium" project,
> > I do not propose any "supper common project", just merge some dependant
code
> > .
> >
>
> It would be a pretty easy mechanical exercise to produce a
> "commons-combo.jar" that just incorporated the latest released version of
> all the packages in commons proper (plus created integrated Javadocs --
> that would be pretty useful just by itself).  Such a thing could be
> updated whenever any particular component package did a release.
>
> That way, we wouldn't need to fight any political battles over what is
> "core" and what is not :-).
>
> Craig
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@generationjava.com>
> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>;
> > <bloritsch@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: Commons Core (was RE: [pattern][lang] Cross dependecy)
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anyhoo, Core is a nicety and something I would like to see happen.
> > >
> > > An important thing for us all to keep in mind is that Core will be as
good
> > > as the parts [marketing blah blah]. So until we get all the parts
ready
> > > and shining, Core remains a pipedream.
> > >
> > > I agree with CLI/Collections being Core-focus.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message