commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Caswell" <ste...@caswell.name>
Subject RE: [VOTE] (3b) XxxUtilsConstructors last chance
Date Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:19:19 GMT
Sorry this response is late, but I have trouble sending e-mail at work.
Yes, in a previous posting I said I would have no problem maintaining
the wrapper.


Steven Caswell
steven@caswell.name
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
"One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geirm@adeptra.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 8:02 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] (3b) XxxUtilsConstructors last chance
> 
> 
> On 8/21/02 7:38 PM, "Steven Caswell" <steven@caswell.name> wrote:
> 
> > My vote is -0 instead of +0 because I haven't heard anyone 
> present a 
> > serious reason as to why a utility class, a non-bean, should be 
> > subject to subclassing.
> 
> I can only assume you're joking.  Maybe someone wants to 
> change the behavior?
> 
> 
> > I can somewhat see the need for construction for tools
> > that require a bean (which a utility class really isn't), 
> but I think 
> > other compromises, such as a wrapper class, would also be 
> reasonable.
> 
> Do you want to maintain that wrapper class?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr. 
> Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
> geirm@adeptra.com
> +1-203-247-1713
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message